To answer this question we will
have to trace the genesis of this word little bit. As they say need is the
mother of invention, this word must have come to vent some human expression or
Idea. A quick check at the Merriam Webster dictionary provides the following reference.
the belief that religion should not play a role in government, education, or other public parts of society
the belief that religion should not play a role in government, education, or other public parts of society
Next imminent question is why it is important?
To fully understand the context we will have to look further back in the time
and the evolution of this concept.
There are broadly two schools of religions, (1) Abrahmic (2) Indic. Abrahmic religions are the one which traces it’s origin around
Let’s analyze
the other school of religions, Indic religions. The genesis of this school lies
in the fact that these religions originated in India .
Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism, Buddhism are some of the religions subscribing to
this school. Out of all these religions Hinduism has been there since the
beginning of the civilization and had great impact on the philosophy and
evolution of other religions of this school. Hinduism needs little bit more
analysis to understand the culture, heritage and philosophy of the Indian
subcontinent. It is interesting to note that this religion was not called
Hinduism till about a thousand years back. Also, this name was given to it by
the people of Persia and is based on the name of
river “Sindhu”, so they called all the inhabitant of the land east of this
river collectively as Hindu. This name got stuck with the people and eventually
came to define the religion of the people of this subcontinent. Next imminent
question is what was this religion called before it was rechristened as
Hinduism? There is no clear answer to this. Some call it “Sanatan Dharma”
meaning “The Eternal Law”, such as honesty, mercy, purity, self-restraint,
tolerance among others. Sometimes it is also called just “Dharma”. Refer to the
definition of Hinduism on Wikipedia here. There is no single
founder or prophet who established this religion. Various philosophy and
beliefs fused under this overarching religion, which includes monotheism,
polytheism, even atheism as long as a person believed in the eternal law, he
was considered to follow Dharma. By extension for all purpose and reference, he
could be called Hindu. What made this fusion of belief, sometime directly
opposing each other possible? Tolerance, respect and accommodation of various
thoughts. One of the core principles of Hinduism is, there are many paths to
reach the almighty and one should select the path according to their own
preference and choice and no path is superior to the other. It also
advocates of “Vasudhaiv Kutumbkum”, which means a person who follows Dharma
treats entire world as his family. This is where it differs from the Abrahmic
religion and rather than exclusive it is inclusive. This trait was inherited by
all the other religions which came into being at a later stage in the school of Indic religion
which includes Buddhism, Jainism and Sikhism. Therefore you will see a Jain or
Bodh(followers of Buddha) visiting a Hindu temple and paying their respect and
vice versa, with clear conscience because there is no restriction in their
religious text to prohibit them from doing so. You can always see a Hindu
visiting a Sikh Gurudwara (Sikh Religious place) and neither Sikh nor Hindu has
any problem with that. You will also see a Sikh paying respect in a Hindu or
Bodh temple. Not only that all the Indic religions celebrate each other’s
festival with absolutely no issue. These Indic religions have flourished side
by side for thousands of years without experiencing any friction. This has been
true even when ruler was a Bodh (Ashoka) or Sikh (Ranjit Singh) and majority of
their subject was Hindu. There was never an attempt to subdue, persecute or
humiliate one religion by another. Ask the follower of any Indic religion
whether the other religion is wrong or whether the follower of other religion
is going to hell after they die? He will surely reply in negative and will
agree that it is decided by their deeds in this world and not the religious
path that they take.
Therefore the
Hindu belief of inclusion and tolerance is at a higher pedestal than secularism
and poses no threat to the follower of any religion. It is inclusive and
tolerant to every faith and religious belief. If India respects its own culture,
heritage and philosophy there is no reason to downgrade it to a lower level of
secularism. Making India as Hindu Rashtra is actually
elevating it to higher level and making it more inclusive rather than
neutral. Indic religions are completely compatible with it and there is no
friction what so ever. But as the modern rulers of India blindly copy everything
western, copied this secular concept of west without giving due thought and
respect to Indigenous philosophy. Therefore they declared India as Secular which is demeaning
and insulting to the indigenous philosophy of inclusion and mutual respect.
Let’s not
stop there and analyze it further, the question now is, whether India is really secular? India has special civil code based
on the religion so it has Hindu Civil Code, Christian Civil Code and Muslim
Civil Code. Hindu civil code is applied to all the followers of Indic religion
including Hindu, Bodh, Jain and Sikh, no surprise here. Last two codes are
applied to Christians and Muslim respectively. Here, Muslim Civil Code is
particularly interesting; it aligns with Sharia law. Let’s take another example, Muslims are given subsidy by Government of India to travel to Saudi
Arabia to perform pilgrimage of Haj.
Everybody knows about Shah Bano case, when Indian Government passed a
legislation to overturn the judgement of Supreme Court because Muslims refused
to accept it. These are only a few of the numerous examples of the way
government practices secularism in India .
Now you be the Judge, whether India is truly secular?
Let me just
try to summarize it, India should be a Hindu Country
which promotes the religious inclusion and tolerance. Politicians in their zeal
to ape west decided to make it secular which is already insulting and demeaning
for the Indian culture. But actually they did not even made it secular in true sense, but what
they ended up making it is a communal country with no equality of its citizen
in the eyes of law. This makes India outright violator of human
rights, which discriminates against its own citizen on the religious basis.
